PodBrowser
The Investors Podcast

TIP839: Domino's Pizza (DPZ): Is the Royalty Engine Still Running? w/ Kyle Grieve & Shawn O’Malley

Thursday, 20 August 2026 · 4 min read · Listen to the episode ↗

Kyle Grieve and Shawn O'Malley examine whether Domino's Pizza, which collects royalties from more than 22,000 franchisee-owned stores across 90 markets, still deserves its reputation as a royalty engine. They find that earnings per share grew at roughly 15 percent annually over two decades largely through $1.32 billion in buybacks in 2022 alone rather than genuine top-line expansion, with NOPAT compounding at only 4.2 percent between 2021 and 2025.

Domino's Pizza operates more than 22,000 stores across over 90 markets, with 99 percent of locations owned by independent franchisees. The company collects US franchise royalties of about 5.5 percent of sales and international royalties of about 3 percent, with total franchisee fees including marketing reaching roughly 10 percent. Kyle Grieve describes this as a royalty engine but cautions that the model does not fully hedge business risk because Domino's income depends directly on franchisee performance.

Revenue grew at approximately 6 percent per year over the last two decades while earnings per share grew at approximately 15 percent annually, a gap driven almost entirely by share buybacks rather than top-line expansion. In 2022 alone, Domino's repurchased $1.32 billion in shares while generating $650 million in operating cash flow. NOPAT compounded at only 4.2 percent between 2021 and 2025, and over the last four years revenue has compounded at roughly 3 percent under current CEO Russell Weiner, compared to approximately 11 percent in the prior decade. US same-store sales growth came in at just 0.1 percent and international same-store sales declined 0.1 percent excluding foreign currency in Q2 2026, and the stock has fallen 40 percent from its all-time highs.

The supply chain segment represents about 60 percent of total revenue in 2025 but carries only around 10 percent EBITDA margins, while the US franchise segment runs at 36 percent and the international franchise segment at 85 percent. Grieve emphasizes the supply chain exists primarily to ensure consistency across franchisees rather than to serve as a profit center, and it operates only in North America. Franchisees are not required to source from Domino's supply centers but most voluntarily do because Domino's shares approximately 50 percent of supply chain operating income with them. Shawn O'Malley notes the wide variation in segment margins makes a sum-of-the-parts valuation more appropriate than treating the enterprise as a single unit.

Long-term debt stands at approximately $4.8 billion against roughly $1 billion in EBITDA, with covenants requiring the company to stay below 5.5 times debt to adjusted EBITDA. Domino's uses whole business securitization, pledging royalty streams, intellectual property, and supply chain income as collateral, and its blended average coupon is 3.82 percent. Grieve flags that rolling debt at progressively higher costs is a concern, and O'Malley warns that if franchisees hit rough spots simultaneously with a debt rollover, creditors hold priority claims on cash flows and would severely limit management discretion and shareholder distributions. Reported equity is negative $4 billion, making return on equity incalculable.

Domino's joined Uber and DoorDash after years of resistance, and management estimates roughly $1 billion in incremental revenue from aggregator platforms against current revenue of around $5 billion. Grieve views this as meaningful but insufficient to restore fast growth, noting aggregator orders carry lower margins and reduce the likelihood of customers migrating to Domino's native app, which carries no aggregator fees. Grieve also cautions that being favored by aggregator algorithms is an advantage that can shift based on changing customer preferences. The US market is likely saturated at over 7,000 locations, making continued international expansion the most powerful lever for future revenue growth.

Grieve has zero conviction that Domino's will still be around in 20 years given health trends and GLP-1 drug adoption, and notes that as generic GLP-1 versions arrive and prices fall, the shift away from unhealthy foods could accelerate. He also flags that Domino's reliance on the college-age demographic is a concern because that cohort tends to view Domino's as less attractive as it ages and earns more. Berkshire Hathaway once held roughly 10 percent of Domino's shares and sold the entire position at the beginning of 2026. Insider ownership sits below 1 percent, and the majority of insider transactions over the last two years have been sales through option exercises with no open market purchases observed.

Grieve's base case intrinsic value is approximately $383 per share, assuming 5.5 percent revenue growth over five years and a 17 times EBITDA multiple with a 20 percent margin of safety. Grieve is taking a complete pass given expensive valuation, limited revenue growth, no expected margin expansion, and lack of compelling competitive advantages. O'Malley applies Warren Buffett's economic franchise criteria and concludes Domino's meets only the first condition of selling a desired product but fails on lack of close substitutes and freedom from price regulation, and says he would only consider the stock at approximately eight times earnings.

This summary was generated from the episode transcript and can contain mistakes.