MacroVoices #534 Dr. Pippa Malmgren: Superpower War or Superpower Hug?
Thursday, 28 May 2026 · 4 min read · Listen to the episode ↗
Dr. Pippa Malmgren joins Erik Townsend to assess whether the US-China-Russia-Iran standoff resolves as superpower war or superpower deal. With the Strait of Hormuz running below 10 percent of normal traffic and roughly 13 million barrels per day shut in, Malmgren and Jim Bianco warn oil could reach 150 to 200 dollars per barrel within a month.
The Strait of Hormuz remains effectively closed as of the episode date, with traffic running below 10 percent of normal. Approximately 13 million barrels per day of Persian Gulf production are shut in, and US spare capacity cannot replace that volume. If the closure persists another month, analysts project oil reaching 150 to 200 dollars per barrel as the market forces 10 to 15 million barrels of demand destruction. Jim Bianco puts global consumption at roughly 105 million barrels per day against supply capacity of only 90 to 95 million barrels, with inventories bridging the gap for perhaps another month. Despite this, WTI front-month oil fell nearly 10 dollars in the prior week, which Malmgren attributes to investors having been burned repeatedly by prior warnings including COVID, 9 percent inflation, Silicon Valley Bank, and Liberation Day.
The central unresolved issue is Iran's 441 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent, physically verified and sealed by IAEA inspectors in approximately 17 or 18 casks. Moving from 60 percent to weapons-grade 90 percent requires only about 1 percent additional effort if operable centrifuges remain available, though Operation Midnight Hammer destroyed an unknown portion of that centrifuge capacity. Trump has stated as an absolute red line that Iran cannot retain this material, while the Iranian Supreme Leader issued a directive stating the uranium cannot leave Iran under any circumstance. No Iranian official has agreed or come close to agreeing to surrender it, and reports of an imminent deal are characterized as propaganda. Malmgren adds that Trump's interest is partly forensic: he wants physical access to even a few grams to establish the material's origin and political connections, attributing to the White House the belief that Barack Obama's fingerprints are on Iran's nuclear program.
Malmgren describes the broader situation as a Rubik's Cube negotiation in which the US, China, and Russia are resolving multiple disputes simultaneously. The US is signaling openness to accepting Taiwan as within China's sphere of influence in exchange for Cuba and Venezuela remaining within the US sphere. The IRGC's decision to close the strait hurt China more than any other party, causing China to withdraw support from Iran, and the first ships through the partially reopened strait were Chinese oil carriers. A deal to sell Alaskan oil to China was reached during the Trump-Xi summit. Cuba and Venezuela have both moved toward handshakes with the US, removing two of Iran's remaining allies. Malmgren says Russia, if forced to choose between Iran and Ukraine, will focus on Ukraine, and that the unresolved piece of the puzzle is Ukraine, not Iran.
Iranian leadership has either fled to Moscow or been eliminated, leaving only competing remnants of a former command structure negotiating simultaneously with multiple superpowers. Scott Bessent deliberately structured conditions so Iran would have no paycheck for several months before military action began, destabilizing the regime ahead of negotiations. Iran has no internal popular support and stays in power only because it controls the guns. Bianco warns there is no forcing mechanism to compel a deal, and that retrieving the buried nuclear material may first require engineers to build a landing strip for heavy equipment, a process that could extend into next year.
Cheap attritable drones have fundamentally changed the military calculus. A US destroyer costs 3 billion dollars and carries only 96 vertically launched missiles, meaning even 100 drones would get some through. During Operation Protect Freedom the US spent approximately 100 million dollars in two days, two of three destroyers had to withdraw to reload, and Gulf countries subsequently told the US it could no longer use their air bases. Malmgren says no major military power including France, the UK, Russia, and China is set up for this new drone-centric warfare.
Malmgren frames the energy disruption as part of a deliberate US strategic transition from molecules to atoms, meaning away from oil and gas dependency toward small modular reactors and advanced nuclear technology. She cites Valor Atomics producing a reactor roughly half the size of a car and Aalo in Austin using Triso fuel pellets that cannot melt down. The White House Genesis mission lifts classification restrictions on national laboratories including Los Alamos, Lawrence Livermore, and Argonne, runs AI across their data, and connects findings previously prohibited from being shared. She says the US has approximately two years of oil and gas supplies to shift global energy markets while this transition accelerates.
The bond market is pricing in rate hikes and CPI is expected above 4 percent, meaning Fed easing in this environment would signal inflation tolerance and push rates higher. Bianco argues cutting rates or subsidizing high energy prices would cause prices to spiral further, and that more supply is the only real fix. Patrick Ceresna's Trade of the Week is a bull call spread on URA, the Global X Uranium ETF, using January 2027 options, buying the 60 call for 5.70 and selling the 70 call for 3.50, for a net debit of 2.20 and a maximum profit of 7.80, offering roughly 3.5 to 1 risk to reward.
This summary was generated from the episode transcript and can contain mistakes.